IELTS Writing Task 2 — Government and Public Spending: a Band 9 sample answer
Updated 26 January 2026 · 2 min read · ieltspractice.app
This Band 9 essay disagrees with the idea that governments should spend on space and the arts before health and education. The writer takes a firm position and defends it with clear reasons.
The question
Some people think that governments should spend money on areas such as space exploration and the arts, rather than on basic services like health and education. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words.
Band 9.0 model answer
Public budgets are limited, so deciding how to spend them is rarely straightforward. Some argue that ambitious projects like space exploration and the arts deserve priority over essential services. I strongly disagree, since a government's first duty is to safeguard the wellbeing of its citizens through robust healthcare and schooling.
The case for prioritising basic services is, to my mind, overwhelming. Health and education form the bedrock of any functioning society: a population that is sick or poorly educated cannot prosper, no matter how impressive its rockets may be. When hospitals are underfunded, preventable illnesses spread and lives are needlessly lost. Likewise, neglecting schools traps the next generation in poverty and deprives the economy of the skilled workers it desperately needs. These are not luxuries that can wait; they are urgent obligations.
This is not to dismiss space science or culture entirely, both of which can inspire innovation and enrich national identity. However, such pursuits should only be funded once core needs are comfortably met. Pouring public money into a space programme while citizens queue for basic treatment strikes me as a profound misjudgement of priorities. A wealthy nation might reasonably afford both, but for most countries the choice is stark.
In conclusion, while grand projects have their place, I firmly believe that governments must channel their resources into health and education first. Only when these foundations are secure can a society justify spending on more aspirational goals.
Why this scores Band 9.0
Task Response
The writer takes a clear 'disagree' position and never wavers from it. Every paragraph supports that view, and the conclusion repeats it without adding anything new.
Coherence & Cohesion
Each paragraph has one main idea. Phrases like 'This is not to dismiss' help the writer admit the other side politely before returning to the argument.
Lexical Resource
Useful topic words appear naturally, such as 'underfunded', 'aspirational goals' and 'the bedrock of any functioning society'. The language stays precise.
Grammatical Range & Accuracy
Sentences vary in length and shape, and the grammar is almost faultless. The writer uses conditionals like 'might reasonably afford' with full control.
Useful vocabulary
- safeguard
- to protect something from harm or loss
- bedrock
- the strong base that something else is built on
- underfunded
- not given enough money to work properly
- neglecting
- failing to give care or attention to something
- stark
- very clear and often harsh, with no middle option
- aspirational
- connected to big hopes and ambitions for the future
Frequently asked questions
Can I completely agree or disagree, or must I be balanced?
You can take a strong one-sided view, and that is fine. Just make sure every paragraph supports it. A small mention of the other side shows maturity but is not required.
What does 'to what extent do you agree' really ask?
It asks how much you agree. You can fully agree, fully disagree, or partly agree. Decide first, then keep the same position throughout your essay.
Should my conclusion add new ideas?
No. A conclusion should sum up your main points and restate your opinion. Adding a brand new idea at the end can confuse the reader and lower your score.
Keep reading
Original IELTS-style practice content. ieltspractice.app is independent and not affiliated with IDP, Cambridge English, or the British Council.